<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Guilan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Algebra and Related Topics</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2345-3931</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Conjectures of Ene, Herzog, Hibi, and Saeedi Madani in the {\sl Journal of Algebra}</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>39</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>46</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">5184</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22124/jart.2021.20356.1305</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>J. D.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farley</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of
Mathematics, Morgan State University, 1700 E. Cold
Spring Lane, Baltimore, USA.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-3247-6014</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>11</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In the preprint of ``Pseudo-Gorenstein and Level Hibi Rings,&#039;&#039; Ene, Herzog, Hibi, and Saeedi Madani assert (Theorem 4.3) that for a regular planar lattice $L$ with poset of join-irreducibles $P$, the following are equivalent:&lt;br /&gt;(1) $L$ is level;&lt;br /&gt;(2) for all $x,y\in P$ such that $y\lessdot x$, $\height_{\hat P}(x)+\depth_{\hat P}(y)\le\rank(\hat P)+1$;&lt;br /&gt;(3) for all $x,y\in P$ such that $y\lessdot x$, either $\depth(y)=\depth(x)+1$ or $\height(x)=\height(y)+1$.&lt;br /&gt;They added, ``Computational evidence leads us to conjecture that the equivalent conditions given in Theorem 4.3 do hold for any planar lattice (without any regularity assumption).&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;Ene {\sl et al.} prove the equivalence of (2) and (3) for a regular simple planar lattice, and write, ``One may wonder whether the regularity condition ... is really needed.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;We show one cannot drop the regularity condition. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ene {\sl et al.} say that ``we expect&#039;&#039; (2) to imply (1) for any finite distributive lattice $L$.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We provide a counter-example.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Distributive lattice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">(partially) ordered set</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rank</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">chain</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">join-irreducible</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jart.guilan.ac.ir/article_5184_c9447ccc21ee53f81415d443ad81b1a9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
