1. F. Azvin and N. Jafari Rad, Bounds on the double italian domination number of a graph, to appear in Discuss. Math. Graph Theory, doi:10.7151/dmgt.2330.
2. F. Azvin, N. Jafari Rad and L. Volkmann, Bounds on the outer-independent double Italian domination number, Commun. Comb. Optim. (6) (1 (2021), 123-136, DOI: 10.22049/CCO.2020.26928.1166.
3. R.A. Beeler, T.W. Haynes and S.T. Hedetniemi, Double Roman domination, Discrete Appl. Math. 211 (2016), 23-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2016.03.017.
4. M. Chellali, T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi and A.A. McRaee, Roman {2}-domination, Discrete Appl. Math. 204 (2016), 22-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2015.11.013.
5. M. Chellali, N. Jafari Rad, S.M. Sheikholeslami, and L. Volkmann, Varieties of Roman domination II, AKCE Int. J. Graphs Comb. (17) 3 (2020), 966-984.
6. E.J. Cockayne, P.A. Dreyer, S.M. Hedetniemi and S.T. Hedetniemi, Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004), 11-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.disc.2003.06.004.
7. G.S. Domke, J.H. Hattingh, S.T. Hedetniemi, R.C. Laskar, and L.R. Markus, Restrained domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 203 (1-3) (1999), 61-69.
8. G. Hao, L. Volkmann, and D.A. Mojdeh, Total double Roman domination in graphs, Commun. Comb. Optim. (5) 1 (2020), 27-39.
9. T. W. Haynes, S. T. Hedetniemi and P. J. Slater, Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs, Marcel. Dekker, New York, 1998.
10. J.H. Hattingh and E.F. Joubert, Restrained and total restrained domination in graphs, Topics in Domination in Graphs (T.W. Haynes, S.T. Hedetniemi, and M.A. Henning, eds.), Springer, (2020), 129-150.
11. M. A. Henning and W. F. Klostermeyer, Italian domination in trees, Discrete Appl. Math., 217 (2017), 557-564,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2016.09.035.
12. R. Jalaei and D.A. Mojdeh, Outer independent double Italian domination: complexity, characterization, Discrete Math., Algorithms and Appl., (15) 3 (2022), 2250085 (13 pages) DOI: 10.1142/S1793830922500859.
13. R. Jalaei and D.A. Mojdeh, Outer independent double Italian domination of some graph products, Theory Appl. Graphs, (10) 1 (2023), Article (5).
14. D.A. Mojdeh and Zh. Mansouri, On the Independent Double Roman Domination in Graphs, Bull. Iran. Math. Soc. 46 (2020), 905-915,https://doi.org/10.1007/s41980-019-00300-9.
15. D.A. Mojdeh, I. Masoumi and L. Volkmann, Restrained double Roman domination of a graph, RAIRO-Oper. Res. 56 (2022), 2293-2304, https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022089.
16. D.A. Mojdeh and A. Teymourzadeh, Upper bounds for covering total double Roman domination, accepted by TWMS J. App. and Eng. Math. (2021).
17. D.A. Mojdeh and L. Volkmann, Roman f3g-domination (double Italian domination), Discrete Appl. Math. 283 (2020), 555-564.
18. C.S. ReVelle and K.E. Rosing, Defendens imperium Romanum: a classical problem in military strategy, Amer. Math. Monthly (107) 7 (2000), 585-594, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2589113.
19. I. Stewart, Defend the Roman empire!, Sci. Amer. (281) 6 (1999), 136-139.
20. B. Samadi, M. Alishahi, I. Masoumi and D. A. Mojdeh, Restrained italian domination in graphs, RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55 (2021), 319-332, https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2021022.
21. A. Teymourzadeh and D.A. Mojdeh, Covering total double Roman domination in graphs, CCommun. Comb. Optim. (8) 1 (2023), 115-125, DOI:10.22049/CCO.2021.27443.1265.
22. E. Vatandoost and K. Mirasheh, Three bounds for identifying code number, J. Algebra Relat. Topics, (10) 2 (2022), 61-67, DOI:10.22124/jart.2022.20661.1321.
23. L. Volkmann, Restrained double Italian domination in graphs, Commun. Comb.Optim. (8) 1 (2023), 1-11, Doi:10.22049/CCO.2021.27334.1236.
24. L. Volkmann, Remarks on the restrained Italian domination number in graphs, Commun. Comb. Optim. (8) 1 (2023) 183-191, DOI:10.22049/CCO.2021.27471.1269.
25. D.B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory. Second Edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2001.